Connect with us

Politics

Election Conspiracy Movement Grinds On As 2024 Approaches

Avatar

Published

on

FRANKLIN, Tenn. (AP) – One by one, presenters in the hotel’s crowded ballroom shared their computer screens and promised to show how easy it is to hack into U.S. electoral systems

They gasped the crowd and highlighted theoretical weaknesses and problems of past elections. But instead of focusing their efforts on improving election security, they argued that all voting machines should be abolished – a message cloaked in conspiracies about electoral fraud in favor of specific candidates.

“We are at war. The only thing that’s not flying right now is bullets,” he said Markus Finchema GOP nominee for Secretary of State in Arizona last year, who is continuing his loss and was the final speaker at the day-long conference.

Finchem belonged to a group of Republican candidates running for governor, secretary of state or prosecutor contesting the result of the 2020 election and who lost in a clean run last November in key political battleground states including Michigan, Nevada, Pennsylvania and Wisconsin.

A participant wearing a shirt mocking President Joe Biden is seen outside an election conspiracy forum in Franklin, Tenn., on Saturday, March 11, 2023 (AP Photo/Wade Payne)
A participant wearing a shirt mocking President Joe Biden is seen outside an election conspiracy forum in Franklin, Tenn., on Saturday, March 11, 2023 (AP Photo/Wade Payne)

But deep distrust of the US elections persists among RepublicansSkepticism fueled by former President Donald Trump false claims and from allies who have traveled the country to meet with community groups and hold forums like just outside of Nashville recently, which was attended by about 250 people.

As the nation heads into the next presidential election, the electoral conspiracy movement that has mushroomed after the last one shows no signs of slowing down.

Advertisement

Millions are convinced that every election their preferred candidate loses has somehow been rigged against them, a belief that feeds Conservative efforts Farewell to voting machines and to Stop or delay certification of election results.

“Voters who know the truth about our elections trust them,” said Liz Iacobucci, program manager for election security at voter advocacy group Common Cause. “But the people who have been led to disbelief – those people can be led to other things, like January 6th.”

Trump running for the White House for the third time, has signaled that the 2020 election will remain an integral part of his 2024 presidential bid. In a recent call with reporters about a new book, Trump pointed to polls showing a significant number of people believe the 2020 election was stolen when it was no such evidence.

“I’m an election denier,” Trump said. “There are many refusers in this country and they are not happy about what happened.”

There was no evidence of widespread fraud or Manipulation of voting machines in the USand multiple times reviews in the Battlefield States where trump denied his loss confirmed that the election results were correct. State and local election officials have spent more than two years explaining the many layers of protection that surround voting systems, and last year’s midterm elections were largely uneventful.

Advertisement

Trump allies such as MyPillow CEO Mike Lindell and former Trump National Security Advisor Michael Flynn remain prominent voices calling for a ban on voting machines. They want handwritten paper ballots to be counted one by one, without the help of machines, by poll workers in nearly 180,000 electoral districts across the country.

“We all have the same agenda of making our elections fair and transparent and where they can’t be hacked,” said Lindell, who recently announced plans to form an “electoral crime agency” to protect his myriad legal safeguards online and Legislative efforts among an organization.

In an interview, Lindell said he has spent $40 million since the 2020 election investigating fraud and supporting efforts to ban voting machines. He said he is taking out loans to continue to fund the work.

During an America First Forum held in South Carolina last month, Flynn told those gathered at a Charleston hotel that they were fighting not only Democrats but also Republicans who are dismissing their concerns about the 2020 election.

“Our Republican Party, they want to move on,” Flynn said via videoconference. “And frankly, the American people are not going to move on.”

Advertisement

An investigation of AP and the PBS series “Frontline” last year investigates how Flynna retired Army Lieutenant General travel the country Spreading conspiracy theories about the 2020 election and vaccines while building a movement based on it Christian nationalist ideas. He draws in part on groups like The America Project and America’s Future.

The Americas Project was started in 2021 by Overstock.com founder Patrick Byrne. Byrne said the election will remain a top priority for the group but will also focus on border issues. When asked how much he plans to spend ahead of the 2024 election, Byrne told the AP, “There’s no budget.”

“I have no children, no wife,” he said. “There’s no point in me saving it for anything.”

Recently filed tax forms don’t specify where the group’s $7.7 million in revenue that year came from, but Byrne and Michael Flynn’s brother, Joseph Flynn, told the AP that most of it came from Byrne himself. The group said they gave Cyber ​​Ninjas $2.75 million for a partisan and much criticized Looking back at the 2020 election in Maricopa County, Arizona, which includes Phoenix.

According to his brother, Michael Flynn is now focused on the nonprofit group America’s Future, which he runs, and other projects. This group reported raising $2.3 million and disbursing $1.2 million in grants in 2021, including nearly $1 million to cyber ninjas.

Advertisement

Others who have been central to efforts to voice doubts about the accuracy of the elections have also been active this year. Among them is Douglas Frank, a math and science educator from Ohio, who said on his social media account that he met with various groups in six states in January and seven states in February and planned to go in March to be eight states.

At the Tennessee forum, Kathy Harms, one of the organizers of the event, took the stage to talk about why she is fighting to end voting machines.

“I’m not doing this for myself. I’d rather just have a grandmother at home,” said Harms, who lives in the county where the conference was held. “I have granddaughters that I do this for because I want them to have what I have. I don’t want a banana republic.”

Presentations by people working in information technology claimed election officials had little security knowledge or experience.

One of them, Mark Cook, guided the participants through the voting process, pointing out potential threats and playing a video he said showed an “Iranian whistleblower” accessing US voter registration data to fraudulently engage in military activities Request and submit ballots.

Advertisement

Cook said the video has some “genuine components” and “might be legitimate.” He did not mention that an influx of duplicate military ballots would be easily detectable because poll workers log each person casting a ballot, meaning a second ballot apparently cast by the same person would be caught.

“There are thousands of ways these systems can be exploited,” Cook said, dismissing poll officials’ security measures as “shell games” and “smoke and mirrors to distract us.”

Election officials acknowledge vulnerabilities exist but say multiple defenses are in place to thwart attempts at tampering or detect malicious activity.

“Election officials and their partners understand that the goal is not to create a perfect electoral system, but one that will ensure that any attack on the electoral system does not exceed the ability to detect and recover from it,” said David Levine , a former local election official who is now a member of the Alliance for Securing Democracy.

Among those listening to the presentations at the Tennessee conference was Luann Adler, a retired educator and school administrator, who said she lost faith in elections after reading articles and watching videos online about voting machines. She has campaigned in her community to ban voting machines and limit voting to a single day.

Advertisement

When she served as a poll worker last year, Adler said she saw no problems. Still, the experience didn’t change her mind.

“As we saw today, a machine can be manipulated,” Adler said. “I don’t point the finger at any person or community as nefarious, but I don’t trust the machine.”

Associated Press writers Michelle R. Smith in Providence, Rhode Island; Nicholas Riccardi in Denver; and Jill Colvin in New York contributed to this report.

var _fbPartnerID = null; if (_fbPartnerID !== null) { fbq('init', _fbPartnerID + ''); fbq('track', "PageView"); }

Politics

Trump Wanted To Undermine Defamation Laws. DeSantis is Taking Action.

Avatar

Published

on

Standing in front of a large American flag an event Promotes civic education “on subjects such as the rights and duties of citizens … and also in understanding the philosophical underpinnings of the American republic,” Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis (R) made a case for abolishing freedom of the press.

He supports Florida House Bill 991DeSantis explained in his plan to facilitate Maybe sue journalists for defamation most controversial by changing the legal status of anonymous procurement. “If someone is being defamed… if [the journalist is] Using anonymous sources, this may be a guess that this was done with malice,” DeSantis said Thursday. “I think what happened is that corporate media in particular relied on anonymous sources to frame people.”

But don’t worry, discouraging HB 991 from sourcing anonymously “won’t make much of a difference in terms of freedom of expression,” DeSantis added. It will merely “make some people not put out things that are wrong, that tarnish someone’s reputation”.

Of course it will also cause Some people don’t want to post things that are true but unflattering to — or implying — public figures like DeSantis the obvious case that anonymous sourcing proves correct, President Richard Nixon.

This bill isn’t all bad, and there’s fair criticism of the over-reliance on anonymous sources when it comes to trivial matters. But all in all, this bill is an assault on press freedom, and his endorsement by DeSantis suggests there isn’t much daylight between him and his alleged chief rival, former President Donald Trump, on a key constitutional matter.

Advertisement

HB 991 is appropriate in a way. For example, it offers that You don’t become a public figure by giving an interview to the press; to “defend publicly against allegations”; be the subject of a viral video or photo; or holding “public employment other than elected office or appointment by an elected official.”

In other words, being a teacher or a DMV employee does not make you a public figure. Let’s not say that “Central Park Karen” or the “nobody has time for that“Woman. In a libel lawsuit, HB 991 says that without any other kind of fame — any willful entry into public life, such as cultivation of fame or running for office — these people should be treated as private individuals who enjoy a stronger standard of reputation protection.

I’m not sure if this distinction is correct Exactly as written. Protecting people who give a man-in-the-street interview or involuntarily become viral memes makes sense, but police officers strike me as public servants who, because of their unique role, which includes proprietary application heard of violence as public figures should be treated. some critics also argued HB 991’s demarcation could violate Supreme Court precedent. Still, the underlying idea – to specify what it means to be a public figure in a digital age where sudden, unwanted notoriety is possible in ways that have not been the case in the recent past – seems fair .

It’s also fair to say that the media sometimes goes overboard with anonymous sourcing. I thought so myself, particularly during the Trump administration, when comments from unnamed “people close to the President” were regularly the basis for high-profile but objectively low-brow reporting of White House personal drama, mostly telling us, knew what we said before: that Trump was petty, sneaky and ill-equipped for office. A story doesn’t have to reach Watergate’s prominence to justify reliance on sources who don’t consent to being credited, but that hardly means every snippet of anonymous gossip deserves publication.

And yet, as always when fundamental individual rights are at stake, there is – or should be – a yawning gap between them this is a foolish or careless or risky way of exercising this right And we should make this functionally illegalwhich HB 991 almost does with anonymous sourcing.

Advertisement

That’s not the only problem with the bill either. Its determination is a “claim that the Complainant discriminated against another person or group because of their race, sex, sexual orientation, or gender identity.” automatically enough for a libel lawsuit is similarly troubling because of its likely impact on freedom of expression.

Likewise, the mention of “any presentation before an audience” or “statement on the Internet” as a basis for cases of defamation. As a New York Times editorial notes, which could respectively mean “testimony at school board hearings and other public gatherings” or “a tweet or Facebook post written by anyone.” It’s not as bad as in the UK charge of “grossly offensive” tweets, but it’s a step in that direction of public speaking.

It’s also a step in the direction Trump wants to go. “One of the things I will do if I win,” he said said in 2016“I’m going to open up our defamation laws so we can sue them and win big bucks if they intentionally write negative and horrible and false articles.”

The was always a pipe dream, since the relevant laws, such as HB 991 itself, are largely determined at the state level and therefore do not fall within the purview of the President. But the animosity that underpins the threat and Trump’s ability to do so as president restrict freedom of the press with tools that are also used below the Obama And Biden administrationsis pretty real.

That animosity is apparently something DeSantis shares. If elected president, he may resort to the same anti-press tools of surveillance and suppression of dissent. And in the meantime, as governor, he could “open” Florida’s libel laws and do in real life what Trump only imagined.

Advertisement

Continue Reading

Politics

Trump's Legal Woes & 2024

Avatar

Published

on


Der Kolumnist und Mitherausgeber von RealClearPolitics, AB Stoddard, trifft im heutigen Takeaway-Podcast auf den RCP-Präsidenten und Mitbegründer Tom Bevan, den Leiter des Washingtoner Büros, Carl Cannon, und den Moderator Andrew Walworth.

Continue Reading

Politics

Michigan Repeals ‘Right-To-Work’ Law In Major Labor Victory

Avatar

Published

on

democrats have taken power in Michigan and they are using it.

On Friday Gov. Gretchen Whitmer (D) signed legislation repealing the state’s decades-old “right to work,” marking a setback for the state’s conservative movement and a landmark victory for its unions.

“Today we come together to restore workers’ rights, protect Michiganans at work, and grow Michigan’s middle class,” Whitmer said in a statement.

Right to work laws prohibit unions and employers from entering into agreements that require each worker to pay fees under the contract to cover negotiation and representation costs. Unions despise the laws, saying they lead to “free riders,” where workers choose not to pay union dues but still enjoy the benefits of a union contract.

Republican leaders passed the state’s Right to Work Act a decade ago. But once Democrats regained the levers of power after last year’s elections, they quickly set about dismantling it. Both the House of Representatives and the Senate recently enacted repeal laws on party-line votes and sent the legislation to Whitmer’s desk.

Advertisement

Unions welcomed the repeal on Friday. Michigan AFL-CIO chief Rob Bieber said the state has “restored the balance of power” for workers.

“After decades of attacks on working people, it’s a new day in Michigan and the future is bright,” Bieber said in a statement.

right to work Laws were legalized by Congress in 1947 and have since spread to most states, including some with historically strong labor movements like Wisconsin. Michigan Republicans led by the government of the time. Rick Snyder (R) passed Michigan law in 2012, dealing a blow to organized labor in a state that is the heart of the US auto industry.

Michigan Gov. Gretchen Whitmer signed a repeal of Michigan's right to work, showing the new power of Democrats in the state.
Michigan Gov. Gretchen Whitmer signed a repeal of Michigan’s right to work, showing the new power of Democrats in the state.

Bill Pugliano via Getty Images

The Economic Policy Institute, a left-leaning think tank, said the law Whitmer signed into law was the first repeal of a state right-to-work law in almost 60 years.

Now that the law is off the books, private sector unions in the state can once again negotiate so-called “union security” clauses. These are requirements that require every worker in the bargaining unit to pay fees to cover the costs associated with negotiating and enforcing the contract. (Michigan’s legislature also voted to repeal the right-to-work law for public sector unions, but that move was only symbolic, as the U.S. Supreme Court ruled the the entire right to work in the US public sector in 2018.)

Advertisement

The Right to Work Act was not Whitmer’s only pro-work move on Friday. She also signed another bill into law that will restore the state’s “prevailing wage law,” which sets minimum wages and benefits for employees on government projects, such as construction and service workers. Such laws, often criticized by conservatives, keep wage rates higher on government-funded construction sites and encourage the use of union workers.

Whitmer’s office said restoring the law would “put more money in people’s pockets” and guarantee Michigan would have a “well-educated, skilled workforce.”

Advertisement
Continue Reading

featured